Chapter four of Michael Moore and Greg Kearsly's Distance Education: A Systems View emphasizes that we no longer need to ask whether distance education courses are as effective as classroom courses. The authors make this argument due to studies that have been conducted which measure the achievement of learning, attitude of students, and cost effectiveness. There are many studies that compare the effectiveness of teaching in the traditional classroom with distance education. According to Distance Education: A Systems View variables that determine the effectiveness of distance education courses include the following:
1. number of students at the learning site,
2. length of class,
3. reasons for student taking class,
4. prior educational background of student,
5. nature of instructional strategies used,
6. kind of learning involved,
7. types of pacing, amount and type of interaction,
8. role of tutors,
9. preparation and experience of instructors and
administrators, and
10. extent of learner support provided.
Research has also shown the effectiveness of learner achievement in distance education. Achievement is measured by grades, test scores, retention and job performance. Of the many studies sited, I found that the study conducted at the high school level comparing seven conventional classrooms to videoconference classes interesting. The results were in favor of the distance education classes through post-test scores. It is though similar evidence to this in many other studies that provide us with reasoning not to question whether distance education is effective in terms of learners' achievement. Instead, these studies bring us answers to the following questions: Does classroom instruction provide the optimum delivery method? Can instruction at a distance be as effective as classroom learning? Is the absence of face-to-face contact damaging to the learning process? Are the same course elements such as designed, delivered, and conducted important in both conventional classrooms and distance education?
There are many more areas of distance education that still need to be researched. Researchers need to be able to built off of one another work. Three areas that are emphasized as fields of promising research include: media effectiveness related to student characteristics, effective course design, and teaching strategies. Following are two on-line resources identified in these fields of study:
Mckenzie, Jamie. The Site-Based Decision-making Guide for Practioners.
Correct Change Press. http://fromnowon.org/SBM/contents.html
The authors of Distance Education: A Systems View would consider
this as an useful addition to research in this field as teaching/administration
strategies. This is a site-based decision-making guide. It is a practical
guide intended to serve those who would apply the techniques of site-based
management to their own school. It emphasis that rapid change in the age
of information demands a new kind of leadership in our school systems.
It contains several interesting topics and helpful appendixes. An outline
of the research includes: