Online

• John Barnard's annotated bibliography on interaction
• Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences (Abstract)[on-line].

Books and Journals

• Ahern, T. C. & Durrington, V. (1995-1996). Effects of anonymity and group saliency on participation and interaction in a computer-mediated small-group discussion. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28, 133-147.
• Barnard, J. (1992). Video-based instruction: issues of effectiveness, interaction, and learner control. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 21, 45-49.
• Berge, Z. (1996) Where interaction intersects time. MC Journal: The Journal of Academic Media Librarianship. Vol4 No1, Summer96, p69-83.
• Crooks, Steven M. and  Klein, James D. et al (1996). Effects of Cooperative Learning and Learner-Control Modes in Computer-Based Instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 29(2)109-124.
• De Vries, Y.E. 1996 The interactivity component of distance learning implemented in an art studio course. Education. Winter96, Vol. 117 Issue 2, p180, 5p. [Online] Available http://www.ebscohost.com.
• Fulford, C. and Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7, 3, 8-21.
• Gunawardena, C.(1995). Social pressure theory and implication for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication,1,(2/3), 147-160.
• Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Leaner-interface interaction in Distance Education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 30-42.
• Huang, A. H. (1996-1997). Challenges and opportunities of online education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 25 (3), 229-247.
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3 (2), 1-6.
• McHenry, L., and Bozik, M. (1995). Communicating at a distance: A study of interaction in a distance education classroom. Communication Education 44,362-371.
• Pierre, S. and Olsen, L.K. (1991). Students perspectives on the effectiveness of correspondence instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 65-71.
• Ritchie, H. (1993). The effects of interaction mode on participation frequency during televised instruction with two-way audio. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 34 (3): 218-226.
• Schlenker, Jon A.(1994). The Socratic Camera, Increasing Interaction with Distant Learners Community College Journal. Jun/Jul, 2--23.
• Sholdt, G.P., Zhang, S., and Fulford, C.P. (1995). Sharing across disciplines: Interaction strategies in distance education -- Part 1. In Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Anaheim, CA.
• Stephenson, S. (1992-93). The effect of student-instructor interaction on achievement in a dyad computer-based training environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21, 27-35.
• Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2): 6-29.
• Wells, John G., Anderson, Daniel K. (1997). Learners in a Telecommunications Course:Adopting, Diffusion and Stages of Concern. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 30(1) 83-106.

On Line Research

• Kearsley, G. (1995) The nature and value of interaction in distance learning. Paper prepared for the Third Distance Education Research Symposium, May 18-21, 1995. [Online] Available http://www.gwu.edu/~etl/interact.
• King, J. and Doerfert, D. (1995) Interaction in the distance setting. [Online] Available http://www.ssu.missouri.edu/SSU/AgEd/NAERM/s-e-4.htm
• Norton, P. and Sprague, D. (1998, Spring). On-line Collaborative Lesson Planning: An Experiment in Teacher Education [WWW document]. URL http://www.coe.uh.edu/insite/elec_pub/html1996/17resear.htm
• Ritchie, and Newby (1989). Classroom lecture/discussion vs. live televised instruction: a comparison of effects on student performance, attitude, and interaction.(Abtract) [On-line] Available.
• Ubermanowicz , S. and Paprzycki, M. (1996) Studying computer awareness. [Online] Available http://www.coe.uh.edu/insite/elec_pub/html1996/17resear.htm